howtos

tutorial

manual

Download the manual (pdf)
glossary

Glossary of Astro-WISE concepts, services, applications and terminology
code updates

News related to important updates to the code.
planning

Wiki site used for work planning (restricted access).

1.1

To derive an astrometric calibration for a given reduced science frame, a
`AstrometricParametersTask` object is used. A global astrometric
solution can be derived using the
`GAstromTask`.

If an astrometric solution is suspect in any way, or if the methods or
calibration catalogs are improved, a new astrometric solution can be derived
without having to recalibrate the `RawScienceFrame` from scratch. This
is accomplished with the `AstrometricParametersTask`. The most ideal
way to do this is with the *DPU* and is illustrated below:

awe> dpu.run('Astrometry', i='WFI', red_filenames=['Sci-USER-WFI-#877-red-53664 .5.fits', ...], C=0)

where `i` is the instrument name (mandatory argument),
`red_filenames` is a file list of `ReducedScienceFrames`, and `C`
is the commit switch used to commit the results to the database. Without the
*DPU*, the task would be run like:

awe> task = AstrometricParametersTask(red_filenames=['Sci-USER-WFI-#877-red-536 64.5.fits'], ... commit=0) awe> task.execute()

where `red_filenames` is a list of filenames of `ReducedScienceFrame`s
and `commit` is the commit switch. The advantage of using the *DPU* over
this method is that it automatically loops over a list of
`ReducedScienceFrame` objects and can run the task on more than one CPU
simultaneously.

1.1.2 Astrometric calibration - a detailed description

Under the hood of the pre-cooked recipes described in §, a set of LDAC routines is called. This section describes these routines and their role in deriving the astrometric calibration. All steps are performed on catalogs of extracted objects and a reference catalog of astrometric stars. For single frame and global frame astrometric processing, the following steps are made:

- Preastrometric pairing and approximate determination of the affine
transformation parameters (
`preastrom`) - Application of the affine transformation to the extraction catalog (
`aplastrom`) - Association of extracted and reference catalogs (
`associate`) - Filter extranous pairs
- Building of a pairs catalog based on the derived associations
(
`make_ssc`) - Derivation of the full astrometric solution (
`astrom`) - Conversion of the astrometric solution parameters to PV parameters
(
`make_distort`)

1.1.2.1

Preastrometric pairing is done on the basis of the WCS information in the FITS
header of the image. For the image area the reference objects are extracted
from the reference catalog and their (alpha, delta) values are converted to the
(x, y) coordinates of the image. Then the x and y distances between all
extracted and reference objects are derived. In this distances space a
concentration is found through boxcar smoothing. The boxcar has a width of
2 `x`
`x`

This offset thus found is applied to the extraction catalog and then a triangulation method is used to derive the remaining affine parameters. For a detailed description of the triangulation method see the LDAC pipeline documentation. In short, vectors connecting triplet of objects are used and a peak is sought in the length/position-angle plane of the vectors. The resulting affine parameters are applied and the number and rms of the fit are reported. To accept the derived affine transformation the reported rms should be less than RMS_TOL.

1.1.2.2

Application of the derive affine transformation to the extracted objects catalogs results in adding a Ra and Dec column to this catalog that represent a good approximation of the true object position. In addition to the position the shape parameters (A_WCS, B_WCS, E_WCS, THETA_WCS) are also transformed using the affine transformation.

1.1.2.3

Association of the extracted objects catalog with the reference catalog is done
on the basis of the positional coincidence of extracted and reference objects
based on the overlap of their shape parameters. Each object is represented by
the 5-tuplet (Ra, Dec, A_WCS, B_WCS, THETA_WCS). Whenever an extracted
object and a reference object overlap with eachother so that for one object
the (Ra, Dec) falls within the (Ra, Dec, S`x`
`x`

Note that when A_WCS and B_WCS are large, because their is a very bright object in the field, the S multiplication size may cause all reference stars in that large area to be associated with the one bright star. For this reason the next step is run.

1.1.2.4 Filtering

Filter extranous pairing removes all very large associations. A good filtering criterion is a pairing distance less than 3 arcseconds.

1.1.2.5

Given the output from the filtered association result for administrative reasons a shuffling of information is necessary and a pairs catalog is build.

1.1.2.6

Deriving an astrometric solutions is what we are all after here. For a detailed description of how the astrometric solution is determined see the LDAC pipeline documentation. Here a short description of this process is given. The affine transformation is extended to a multidimensional polynomial of degree AstrometricParameters.astromconf.PDEG. In general a 2 dimensional polynomial is good enough to represent the deformation of the light path through the telescope and the imperfections of the plate mount in the focal plane of the telescope. The least square fit of the estimated astrometric solution using the pair information is performed in an iterative process where 3 sigma outliers (pairs) are discarded for the next iterative step. Outliers are removed because propper motion or image artifacts may have created erroneous pairs. The number of iterations steps NITER should be enough, 5 seems a good choice for many applications.

For multi frame processing, Global astrometry, pairs among extracted objects were also created in the previous steps. These pairs participate in the solution as well and because they generally are in over abundance with respect to the extracted objects vs. reference objects pairs they dominate the solution accuracy. Presuming the pointing differences among overlappin exposures are small, the astrometric solution for each pointing could be identical (FDEG = 1 0 0). This may not be the case. In extreme conditions the astrometric solution among the different pointing could be independent of eachother, however, their might be a gradual change of each of the astrometric parameters with pointing. This is represented by a Chebychev polynomial of a certain degree. For each astrometric solution polynomial parameter one can choose a Chebychev polynomial degree. FDEG = 1 0 0 means a Chebychev polynomial of degree 1 for the astrometric distortion polynomial of degree 1, a Chebychev polynomial of degree 0 for the astrometric distortion polynomial of degree 2, etc.

1.1.2.7

The final result of the astrometric solution is represented in an internal format that has to be converted to standard WCS patameters.

page generated Tue Apr 4 14:29:04 CEST 2017